what is the use of scientific methods such as carbon dating to determine the age of an artifact

Return to Educational activity eHRAF: Tile View | Table View

View practise overview

Overview

Exercise ID: ii.6
Class size: Whatever

Level(s): Two III IV
Source: Produced past HRAF

Learning Objectives

Does the exercise compare 2 or more than cultures? Yes
Field of study selection: Unmarried subject specified past teacher
Subjects/OCMS, if applicative: dating methods
Region option: open (student choice)
Region, if applicable: Various
Culture selection: Student chooses from entire collection
Cultures/OWCs, if applicative:
Samples:

Classroom Guide

Instructions for navigating eHRAF included? Yes
Assignments for students to consummate in groups? Yes
Assignments for students to complete on their ain? Yes
Instructions for Microfiche version? No

 

Francine Barone, Man Relations Area Files at Yale Academy

View related workbook: Dating Methods

The Earth is effectually four.six billion years old. Concrete evidence of geological changes and the mineralized remains of living organisms (fossils), also as material remains and artifacts of human societies, offering archaeologists of import insights into the past.

Archaeologists seek to place discoveries within a broader historical framework; in other words, to get a sense for the time menstruum that an object comes from and how information technology relates to other finds, times, and places in the archaeological record. This helps to build a better picture of how humans lived in the by, besides every bit how humanity, culture, and societies evolved over time.

There are a variety of scientific methods that archaeologists employ to analyze the age and origins of fossils, remains, or other artifacts. Dating methods can enable bio-archaeologists to determine factors such as environment, diet, health, or migration patterns of humans, plants, or animals. Knowing the historic period of an object of fabric culture, how it was fabricated, and the surrounds in which it was found, also help classical, historical, or ethnoarchaeologists to improve hypothesize the purpose or cultural pregnant that might have been attributed to information technology in the past. Ordering archaeological finds inside time periods beyond traditions is how archaeologists slice together the past that connects all contemporary cultures today.

Relative vs. Absolute Dating

How practice archaeologists determine how sometime an object is?

Relative dating methods gauge whether an object is younger or older than other things establish at the site. Relative dating does non offer specific dates, it simply allows to determine if one artifact, fossil, or stratigraphic layer is older than some other.

Accented dating methods provide more specific origin dates and time ranges, such as an historic period range in years. How specific these dates tin can be will depend on what method is used.

Relative Dating Methods

Stratigraphy: Assuming that soil layers in a deposit accumulate on summit of one another, and that the lesser layers will exist older than the top layers, stratigraphy allows archaeologists to construct a relative chronological sequence from the oldest (bottom) to youngest (meridian) layers. Artifacts found in these layers are at least as old as the deposit in which they were institute.

Seriation: a technique that was common in the mid-20^th century, seriation looks at changes in sure styles of artifacts nowadays at a site. A chronology is developed based on the assumption that one cultural way (or typology) will slowly replace an earlier style over time.

Fluorine dating: a technique that analyzes how much of the chemical fluorine has been absorbed by bones from the surrounding soils in order to make up one's mind how long the specimen has been underground.

Absolute Dating Methods

Radiocarbon Dating: One of the virtually widely known radiometric dating techniques, radiocarbon dating measures the decay of the radioactive isotope Carbon-xiv (C-14) in any organic textile found in archaeological deposits, such as woods, plants, textiles, and human being or animal remains to determine its historic period.

Dendrochronology: Since nearly trees produce a ring of new forest annually, archaeologists use the variations in cross-sections of wood to produce timelines.

Thermoluminescence: Useful for determining the historic period of pottery or ceramics, it can be used to date materials containing crystalline minerals to a specific heating event in the by (such every bit when the item was made).

Fission-runway dating: A technique that determines historic period of various minerals and glasses based on the trails of harm washed by the spontaneous fission of uranium-238, the most abundant isotope of uranium.

Potassium-argon (K-Ar) and Argon-argon (Ar-Ar): measure out the ratio of argon gas in igneous volcanic rock to estimate how much fourth dimension has elapsed since the rock cooled and solidified.

Archaeomagnetic dating: Magnetic particles in well-nigh materials of geological origin, such as rocks and clay, are analyzed to runway shifts in the earth'due south magnetic fields over time.

Dating Methods in eHRAF Archeology

Select three or more than of the dating methods divers above, or any additional techniques described in your textbook.

In eHRAF Archæology, conduct an Avant-garde Search to learn more about how these dating methods have been used by archaeologists.

As illustrated below, use the subject identifier Dating Methods in Archaeology (1211) and one or more than dating techniques as keywords of your option. You may as well narrow your search by selecting one or more regions or traditions, or by adding keywords for specific artifacts or archaeological discoveries that you are familiar with.

Sample Searches

Find evidence from at least 3 traditions in different regions in eHRAF. Record your information in a tabular array similar the sample table provided below. Copy and paste the paragraph describing dating methods in the table. Be sure to proceed track of which traditions and dating methods you have establish, as well as the document that it came from (citation).

Sample Table

Analysis questions

• What object or objects were being dated?
• What historic period was adamant?
• How trusted were the dates?
• What impact did the dating have on archaeologists' understanding of the tradition and its chronology, or the objects/artifacts/fossils under test?
• Did researchers signal out whatsoever weaknesses or discrepancies in the dating methods used?
• Based on your enquiry, which dating method(due south) do you believe to be the most accurate? The least accurate?
• Was more than 1 dating method used? Why or why non?
• Were there any dating methods that yous could not find evidence of in eHRAF?

watermancarme1953.blogspot.com

Source: https://hraf.yale.edu/teach-ehraf/relative-and-absolute-dating-methods-in-archaeology/

Share this post